<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Paul Randall &#187; wimcrouwel</title>
	<atom:link href="https://paulrandall.com/tag/wimcrouwel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://paulrandall.com</link>
	<description>Experimenting for a living.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2025 15:32:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Should The Grid Be Visible?</title>
		<link>https://paulrandall.com/2010/02/22/should-the-grid-be-visible/</link>
		<comments>https://paulrandall.com/2010/02/22/should-the-grid-be-visible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wimcrouwel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prandall.com/?p=321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of recent designs have left me wondering whether we should be &#8216;showing our workings&#8217; and display the grid at all, whether subtlety like Jina Bolton&#8217;s Sushi &#038; Robots or something more elaborate, like Analog (note: press Alt+G). Once visible, the precision of the grid acts as evidence of design credibility, and its purity [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://paulrandall.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/2925-200x300.jpg" alt="Vormgevers exhibition poster in 1968 by Wim Crouwel" title="Vormgevers exhibition poster in 1968 by Wim Crouwel" width="200" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-322" /></p>
<p>A couple of recent designs have left me wondering whether we should be &#8216;showing our workings&#8217; and display the grid at all, whether subtlety like <a href="http://sushiandrobots.com/">Jina Bolton&#8217;s Sushi &#038; Robots</a> or something more elaborate, like <a href="http://analog.coop/">Analog</a> (note: press Alt+G).</p>
<p><span id="more-321"></span></p>
<blockquote style="padding-bottom:0"><p>Once visible, the precision of the grid acts as evidence of design credibility, and its purity of form has a mystical draw.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><em style=font-size:11px;">A Brief History of Grids, Lucienne Roberts <a href="http://www.graphics.com/modules.php?name=Sections&#038;op=viewarticle&#038;artid=620">http://www.graphics.com/modules.php?name=Sections&#038;op=viewarticle&#038;artid=620</a></em></p>
<p style="float:left; clear:both">Having a visible grid is certainly not new; Here you can see the Vormgevers exhibition poster in 1968 by Wim Crouwel.</p>
<p style="float:left; clear:both">I&#8217;m certainly not going to say if the grid should be visible or not, but I&#8217;d love to hear your thoughts or opinions on the topic, or just to add a link to a site where you have seen a visible grid used well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://paulrandall.com/2010/02/22/should-the-grid-be-visible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
